Ximelagatran versus warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. SPORTIF II: a dose-guiding, tolerability, and safety study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES We sought to compare the tolerability and safety of three fixed doses of ximelagatran versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). BACKGROUND Anticoagulants such as warfarin lower the risk of stroke in patients with NVAF. Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor with predictable pharmacokinetics and no known food or pharmacokinetic drug interactions. METHODS This was a 12-week, randomized, parallel-group, dose-guiding study of NVAF patients with at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary end point was the number of thromboembolic events and bleedings. Three groups received ximelagatran (n = 187) at 20, 40, or 60 mg twice daily, given in a double-blind fashion, without routine coagulation monitoring. In a fourth group, warfarin (n = 67) was managed and monitored according to normal routines, aiming for an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. RESULTS A total of 254 patients received study drug. One ischemic stroke (nonfatal) and one transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred in the ximelagatran group. Two TIAs occurred in the warfarin group. No major bleeds were observed in the ximelagatran group. One major bleed occurred in a warfarin-treated patient. The number of minor and multiple minor bleeds was low, but there was a slight increase by ximelagatran dose. The 60-mg dose resulted in the same number of bleeding events as that with warfarin. S-alanine aminotransferase was increased in eight patients (4.3%) taking ximelagatran, but normalized with continuous treatment or cessation of the drug. CONCLUSIONS Fixed oral doses of ximelagatran up to 60 mg twice daily were well tolerated, without the need for dose adjustment or coagulation monitoring.
منابع مشابه
Secondary stroke prevention with ximelagatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: pooled analysis of SPORTIF III and V clinical trials.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk for recurrent stroke. We investigated whether ximelagatran was noninferior to warfarin in patients with prior stroke or TIA. METHODS We analyzed pooled data from the SPORTIF III and V trials in patients with prior stroke/TIA. The primary outcome was the com...
متن کاملXimelagatran for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and the most frequently encountered cause of embolic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) have represented the cornerstone of anticoagulation practice for the last 60 years. Although highly effective in preventing thromboembolic events among patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin therapy is limited by a multitu...
متن کاملPreventing stroke in atrial fibrillation: the SPORTIF programme.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac risk factor for stroke. Oral anticoagulants such as the vitamin K antagonist warfarin have been proven effective in reducing the risk of stroke in AF. Warfarin, however, has many disadvantages including the need for coagulation monitoring, a narrow therapeutic index, inter-/intra-patient variability and food-drug interactions. As a result, war...
متن کاملXimelagatran versus warfarin in the prevention of atrial fibrillation-related stroke: both sides of the story.
Ximelagatran Versus Warfarin in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation–Related Stroke: Both Sides of the Story To the Editor: We have carefully read the interesting article by Akins et al1 focusing on a pivotal issue in the prevention of atrial fibrillation-related stroke. The authors pooled the data from high-risk (previous stroke/ TIA) versus nonhigh-risk (no previous stroke/TIA) patients incl...
متن کاملDisparate stroke rates on warfarin among contemporaneous cohorts with atrial fibrillation: potential insights into risk from a comparative analysis of SPORTIF III versus SPORTIF V.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The rate of stroke among warfarin-treated patients in SPORTIF V was approximately half that of patients enrolled in SPORTIF III (1.16%/year versus 2.30%/year). SPORTIF III was an open-label trial comparing ximelagatran with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. SPORTIF V was a double-blind trial performed in North America. The trial design was otherwise i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
دوره 41 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003